Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | ZTE |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-01 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Black, Ochre and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ has a global score of 81, which is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro's general score of 76.6. These phones work with the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that. LG G7 ThinQ is a just a bit lighter phone than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, but they are equally thin.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has just a bit better hardware performance than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
LG G7 ThinQ takes a little bit better videos and photos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a camera with a much worse resolution and a way tinier back camera sensor taking much lower quality videos and photographs, it also counts with a much better video quality and a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and videos.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a bit bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has an external SD slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with better battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 33% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.