Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-11 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 215.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ is slightly better than Google Pixel 4a, with a overall score of 84.3 against 82.9. These phones work with Android OS, but the LG G8 ThinQ has newer 9.0 Pie version and Google Pixel 4a has Android 11 version. LG G8 ThinQ is a better device than Google Pixel 4a, we must highlight that it's also an older, heavier and a bit thicker device.
The LG G8 ThinQ has a much better display than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen, a bit larger display and a better 1440 x 3120px resolution. LG G8 ThinQ features a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 4a. They have 8 cpu cores and a 6 GB RAM.
The LG G8 ThinQ has a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller sensor taking less light and dull colors, a back facing camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited environments.
The LG G8 ThinQ has a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG G8 ThinQ counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
LG G8 ThinQ is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.