Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-11 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 215.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a global score of 85.4, which is just a bit better than LG G8 ThinQ's score of 84.3. The LG K92 construction has the same thickness than LG G8 ThinQ, but it's somewhat heavier. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the LG K92 has the previous 10 version while LG G8 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a little faster CPU than LG K92. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 cores. LG G8 ThinQ counts with a brighter display than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per display inch.
LG K92 features as much memory to install games and applications as the LG G8 ThinQ, they have a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and the same internal storage. LG K92 counts with a much better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking pictures and/or video in poorly lited environments and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the LG K92 also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photographs and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
LG K92 has a bit better battery performance than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG G8 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G8 ThinQ. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy LG G8 ThinQ, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.