Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-04-11 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 215.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a little bit better than LG G8 ThinQ, getting a overall score of 86.3 against 84.3. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an older 14 version while LG G8 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie. Although Motorola Edge 50 Pro is heavier than the LG G8 ThinQ, it's just a little thinner and also a lot newer.
The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. LG G8 ThinQ features a little bit better screen than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has much darker screen and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a way higher resolution camera in the back, a larger diafragm aperture and a lot bigger back camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features just a bit more storage for games and applications than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features superior battery life than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.