Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-11 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 215.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is just a bit better than LG G8 ThinQ, having a global score of 86.2 against 84.3. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS, but Moto G200 5G has older 11 version and LG G8 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Moto G200 5G is a newer phone than LG G8 ThinQ, but it's a little bit thicker and heavier.
Moto G200 5G counts with just a little better performance than LG G8 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cores, the Moto G200 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The LG G8 ThinQ features a brighter screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
The LG G8 ThinQ has much more storage to install applications and games than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G8 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Moto G200 5G takes much better photographs and videos than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rates and a way tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Moto G200 5G has a much better battery duration than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.