Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-11 | -- |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 215.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ is just a bit better than Moto G60s, with a general score of 84.3 against 79.9. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but LG G8 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Moto G60s has Android 11 version. LG G8 ThinQ's design is somewhat thinner and a lot lighter than Moto G60s.
The LG G8 ThinQ counts with just a bit better performance than Moto G60s, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG G8 ThinQ features a brighter screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The LG G8 ThinQ has a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G60s, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. Moto G60s counts with a much better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and videos and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G60s also counts with a camera with much more megapixels.
Motorola Moto G60s has a much longer battery lifetime than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 43% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.