Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-04-11 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 215.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ is better than Motorola Moto Z Force, with an 84.3 score against 75.8. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but LG G8 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Although LG G8 ThinQ is newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force, it is a little bit heavier and thicker.
The LG G8 ThinQ features a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a bit more pixels per inch of display, a little bit bigger display and a quite better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution. The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a bigger memory to install applications and games than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG G8 ThinQ also has more internal storage capacity.
The LG G8 ThinQ has a bit better processor than Moto Z Force, because it has 2 GB more RAM and 4 more cpu cores. Moto Z Force has a battery life that's very similar to the LG G8 ThinQ one. LG G8 ThinQ shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a camera with a lot worse resolution and a lower video definition, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and video in low light environments.
LG G8 ThinQ not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the Motorola Moto Z Force, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.