Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-11 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 215.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8 ThinQ has a general score of 84.3, which is a little bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 score. LG G8 ThinQ's design is newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition's, although it's thicker and heavier. LG G8 ThinQ counts with just a bit better screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a little bigger display and a little bit greater pixel number in each inch in the display.
LG G8 ThinQ has a better memory for games and applications than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG G8 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage. LG G8 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG G8 ThinQ shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same resolution camera in the back, the LG G8 ThinQ also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality and a way larger aperture for better photos in low light environments.
LG G8 ThinQ has longer battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 2730mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the LG G8 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.