Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-11 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 215.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ has an overall score of 84.3, which is better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. LG G8 ThinQ's body is lighter and thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S, even when both were only released 6 months apart. These devices work with the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding operating system features.
The LG G8 ThinQ has a much better display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel amount in each inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better hardware performance than LG G8 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a camera with way more mega-pixels, a lot better video definition and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality pictures and videos. The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better battery life than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, LG G8 ThinQ is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.