Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-11 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 215.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8 ThinQ is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2, getting an 84.3 score against 79.7. The LG G8 ThinQ construction is somewhat lighter than OPPO Find X2, although it is just a little bit thicker and was released a bit more more than a year before. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but LG G8 ThinQ has newer 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Find X2 has Android 10 version.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a screen that's just as good as the LG G8 ThinQ one, because although the OPPO Find X2 has a bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a little larger display, more brightness and a bit higher 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution. LG G8 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games than OPPO Find X2, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
OPPO Find X2 features a little better hardware performance than LG G8 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 also has a greater amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 captures much better photos and videos than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution and a way larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and photos.
OPPO Find X2 has superior battery duration than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.