Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-11 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 215.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8 ThinQ is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, having a score of 84.3 against 83.1. These devices use Android OS, but the LG G8 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10, so it gives you a lot of extra features and performance tweaks. Although the LG G8 ThinQ is older than OPPO Find X2 Pro, it's construction is a little thinner and somewhat lighter.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a display that's just as good as the display in LG G8 ThinQ, because although the OPPO Find X2 Pro has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a brighter display, a little larger display and a slightly higher 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little better performance than LG G8 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications and games than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features longer battery lifetime than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 4260mAh battery size.
OPPO Find X2 Pro captures much better photos and videos than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking pictures in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels and a much bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.