Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-04-11 | 2021-12-03 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 215.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8 ThinQ is a little bit better than Galaxy A13 5G, having a score of 84.3 against 82.1. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but the LG G8 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy A13 5G has Android 12, so it gives you a couple additional features and performance optimizations. Despite of the fact that the LG G8 ThinQ is extremely older than Galaxy A13 5G, it's design is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner.
The LG G8 ThinQ counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per inch in the display and a way better 1440 x 3120px resolution.
The Galaxy A13 5G counts with a little bit better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs in low-light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a back camera with a much better 50 MP resolution.
The LG G8 ThinQ has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has a much better battery lifetime than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.