Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-11 | 2021-06-24 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 215.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G is a little bit better than the LG G8 ThinQ, getting an 84.6 score against 84.3. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy A22 5G has an older 11 version and LG G8 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy A22 5G body is incredibly newer than LG G8 ThinQ's, although it's just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
The LG G8 ThinQ has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a higher display pixel density. LG G8 ThinQ features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG G8 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A22 5G features a slightly better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
LG G8 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a very superior battery performance than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.