Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-04-11 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 215.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ is a bit better than the Galaxy A25 5G, getting an 84.3 score against 79.9. LG G8 ThinQ is a somewhat lighter phone than the Galaxy A25 5G, but both are equally thin. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G8 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14, offering some additional features and performance optimizations.
The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display and way more opaque display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a better amount of pixels per screen inch. The LG G8 ThinQ counts with more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy A25 5G. Both have a Octa-Core processor and 6 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera sensor shooting worse quality pictures, a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting images or video in low light situations and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The Galaxy A25 5G has a much longer battery performance than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.