Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-04-11 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 215.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ is a bit better than the Galaxy A35 5G, with a general score of 84.3 against 79.4. Even though LG G8 ThinQ is a lot older and just a little thicker than Galaxy A35 5G, it's construction is still notably lighter. These devices work with Android OS, but the LG G8 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version.
LG G8 ThinQ has a sharper screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch in the display, a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a quite brighter screen. The LG G8 ThinQ counts with an extremely better CPU than Galaxy A35 5G. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a superior camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rate and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a lot better resolution camera and a much larger camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos.
The LG G8 ThinQ features a much greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A35 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.