Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-11 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 215.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is slightly better than the LG G8 ThinQ, with a global score of 90.7 against 84.3. Galaxy A52 is a heavier phone than LG G8 ThinQ, but both of them are equally thin. The LG G8 ThinQ features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52. Both have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM.
LG G8 ThinQ has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a superior camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution camera and a much larger back camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality.
LG G8 ThinQ counts with a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the LG G8 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A52 has improved battery duration than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.