Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-04-11 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 215.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a little bit better than the LG G8 ThinQ, having a score of 91.3 against 84.3. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has older 12 version while LG G8 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a heavier device than LG G8 ThinQ, but both are 0.33inches thick.
The LG G8 ThinQ has a brighter screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a better pixels density. The LG G8 ThinQ has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A52 5G. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a superior camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
LG G8 ThinQ has a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG G8 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A52 5G has improved battery life than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 29% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.