Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-11 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 215.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is slightly better than the LG G8 ThinQ's 84.3 overall score. These phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A52s has 11 version and LG G8 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy A52s's design has the same thickness than LG G8 ThinQ, but it is somewhat heavier.
LG G8 ThinQ has a bit better processor than Galaxy A52s. Both have 8 processing cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a higher pixels density.
The Galaxy A52s takes much clearer photographs and videos than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a way larger camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures and a camera in the back with way more MP.
The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a better memory for applications and games than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG G8 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A52s has greater battery duration than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.