Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-11 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 215.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is a bit better than LG G8 ThinQ, having an 88.1 score against 84.3. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Galaxy F62 has older 11 version and LG G8 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy F62's design is newer than the LG G8 ThinQ's, but it's somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier. The LG G8 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the LG G8 ThinQ also has more CPU cores.
LG G8 ThinQ has a brighter screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more brightness, a greater pixels density and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG G8 ThinQ features a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG G8 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much longer battery life than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 100 percent more battery capacity. The Galaxy F62 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a much bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality photos and a lot more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.