Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-11 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 215.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a bit better than the LG G8 ThinQ, getting a overall score of 89 against 84.3. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a a little thinner device than LG G8 ThinQ, but both weight 5.89oz. The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a higher pixels count in each inch of screen.
LG G8 ThinQ has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G8 ThinQ and Samsung Galaxy Note10 feature incredibly similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy Note10 captures a little bit better videos and photos than LG G8 ThinQ, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, a same size diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy Note10 also has a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10's battery performance is just as good as the LG G8 ThinQ one.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG G8 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G8 ThinQ. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy LG G8 ThinQ, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.