Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-11 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 215.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is much better than the LG G8 ThinQ, having a general score of 93.6 against 84.3. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy S10 5G has an older 11 version while LG G8 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy S10 5G's body is heavier but a little bit thinner than LG G8 ThinQ, and they were only released 1 months apart.
The Galaxy S10 5G's processing unit is just as good as the processing unit in LG G8 ThinQ, and although the Galaxy S10 5G has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. LG G8 ThinQ counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixel density and a little bit higher 1440 x 3120px resolution.
Galaxy S10 5G captures a bit better photographs and videos than LG G8 ThinQ, and although they both have a F1.5 aperture, the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video resolution and a 12 mega pixels resolution back camera, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
The LG G8 ThinQ has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has longer battery life than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
The Galaxy S10 5G costs a lot more money than the LG G8 ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.