Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-11 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 215.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is a bit better than LG G8 ThinQ's 84.3 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S10e construction is a little thinner and lighter than the LG G8 ThinQ, even when they were released only a few months apart. LG G8 ThinQ features a better display than Galaxy S10e, because it has a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution, a better screen density and a little bit larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S10e's CPU is just as good as the CPU in LG G8 ThinQ, they have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. The LG G8 ThinQ features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S10e takes just a bit better pictures and videos than LG G8 ThinQ, and although they both have the same video resolution, a back-facing camera with a 12 megapixels resolution, a F1.5 aperture and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy S10e also has a larger back camera sensor. LG G8 ThinQ features a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S10e is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG G8 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G8 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S10e, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG G8 ThinQ, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.