Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-04-11 | -- |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 215.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ is better than Galaxy S24 FE, getting an 84.3 score against 76. Both devices in our current comparison use Android operating system, but the LG G8 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14, giving you lots of additional features. The LG G8 ThinQ is a extremely lighter but just a little bit thicker device than Galaxy S24 FE.
LG G8 ThinQ features a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores. The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a little bit smaller display and way more opaque screen, it also counts with a higher pixel amount per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120.
LG G8 ThinQ features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture. The LG G8 ThinQ has a superior storage for applications and games than Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S24 FE counts with a much longer battery duration than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG G8 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.