Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-04-11 | -- |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 5.89 ounces | -- |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 215.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8 ThinQ is slightly better than the Galaxy S25, getting an 84.3 score against 82.6. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G8 ThinQ has newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy S25 has Android 14, so it counts with a couple nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a bit sharper screen than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a much worse display pixels density and a lot lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a lot brighter display and a quite larger display.
LG G8 ThinQ has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S25, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a much better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 captures way better photos and videos than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light images, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a little longer battery lifetime than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
LG G8 ThinQ is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.