Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-04-11 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 215.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 563 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8 ThinQ has an overall score of 84.3, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's score of 80.1. The LG G8 ThinQ body is incredibly thinner and much lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, despite of the fact that it was released a bit more over a year before. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the LG G8 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo, so it gives you a lot of extra features.
LG G8 ThinQ counts with just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a quite worse pixel count in each screen inch, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a larger screen. The LG G8 ThinQ features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
LG G8 ThinQ counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G8 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. LG G8 ThinQ has a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same resolution back camera and the same camera aperture, the LG G8 ThinQ also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with superior battery performance than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
LG G8 ThinQ not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.