Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-11 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 215.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8 ThinQ has an overall score of 84.3, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 overall score. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but the LG G8 ThinQ has newer 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11. Despite of the fact that the LG G8 ThinQ is older than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, it's design is way lighter and thinner.
The LG G8 ThinQ has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G8 ThinQ has a bit better performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG G8 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The LG G8 ThinQ shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lot less megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light situations.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features greater battery lifetime than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the LG G8 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.