Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.3 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | ZTE |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-11 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 215.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ has a general score of 84.3, which is slightly better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro's overall score of 80.2. The LG G8 ThinQ body is a little bit thicker but a little bit lighter than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and both were released with only a couple of months difference. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the LG G8 ThinQ has newer 9.0 Pie version and ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10 version.
The LG G8 ThinQ has a more vivid display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120px resolution and a greater pixel density. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has more storage capacity for games and applications than LG G8 ThinQ, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has more internal memory.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a little faster processing unit than LG G8 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has more RAM. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery life than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing photos and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also counts with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
LG G8 ThinQ is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.