Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-07-02 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2248 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the LG G8S ThinQ's score of 82.5. The LG Velvet body has the same thickness than LG G8S ThinQ, but it's a bit lighter. LG G8S ThinQ has just a little better performance than LG Velvet. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
LG G8S ThinQ counts with a little sharper display than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2248px, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density. The LG Velvet takes much better photos and videos than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same aperture, the LG Velvet also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
LG Velvet's memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to the LG G8S ThinQ one, both have the same internal storage and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Velvet counts with improved battery duration than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a 21% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.