Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-07-02 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2248 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is a little bit better than Moto Z Force's 75.8 overall score. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but LG G8S ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version, so it provides the user a lot of extra features and performance improvements. LG G8S ThinQ's design is way newer, but a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier than the Moto Z Force.
Moto Z Force features a little more vivid display than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The LG G8S ThinQ has a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto Z Force, and although they both have an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG G8S ThinQ also has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
LG G8S ThinQ features a little faster processor than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM memory. The Moto Z Force features a little bit better camera than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto Z Force also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The LG G8S ThinQ has just a bit better battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has a 3550mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.