Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-07-02 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2248 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is a bit better than LG G8S ThinQ, getting an 87 score against 82.5. Motorola razr (2020)'s construction has the same thickness than the LG G8S ThinQ, but it's a bit heavier. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version and LG G8S ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie.
The LG G8S ThinQ features a bit better screen than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have a display with the same size, the LG G8S ThinQ also has a bit greater display density and a slightly better 1080 x 2248 resolution. LG G8S ThinQ has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG G8S ThinQ counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola razr (2020), although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola razr (2020) has a better camera than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited situations and a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The LG G8S ThinQ features improved battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 27 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.