Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-07-02 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2248 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro is a little bit better than the LG G8S ThinQ, having a overall score of 83.1 against 82.5. OPPO Find X2 Pro's body is newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the LG G8S ThinQ. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has an older 10 version while LG G8S ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processor than LG G8S ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much better looking display than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has more pixels per inch in the display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a little bigger screen.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a greater camera than LG G8S ThinQ, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and video and a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has longer battery life than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a 4260mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.