Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-07-02 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2248 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G8S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 overall score. Both of these devices have Android OS, but LG G8S ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features. LG G8S ThinQ's body is lighter and a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before.
The LG G8S ThinQ has a very superior processing power than Galaxy A35 5G. Both have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Galaxy A35 5G has a bit more vivid display than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit lower display density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little larger display.
LG G8S ThinQ has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G8S ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a better camera than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much better battery performance than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3550mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.