Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-07-02 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2248 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is slightly better than the LG G8S ThinQ's 82.5 general score. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A50s has older 10 version while LG G8S ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy A50s is a a bit lighter and just a little thinner cellphone than the LG G8S ThinQ, even though both of them were released only 4 months apart.
The LG G8S ThinQ features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s. Both have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. The LG G8S ThinQ counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy A50s, although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2248 pixels, a little bit smaller screen and a little worse screen pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a better camera than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light images and video, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a lot higher 48 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The LG G8S ThinQ counts with a much better memory for apps and games than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G8S ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A50s features a bit superior battery duration than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3550mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.