Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-07-02 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2248 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is a bit better than the LG G8S ThinQ's score of 82.5. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 has 11 version while LG G8S ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy A51 is a just a little bit lighter cellphone than LG G8S ThinQ, but both of them are 0.31inches thick.
LG G8S ThinQ counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A51, although it has a little smaller screen, a just a little worse pixels quantity per display inch and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2248px. LG G8S ThinQ has a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG G8S ThinQ also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G8S ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8S ThinQ also has more RAM. Galaxy A51 has a little better battery lifetime than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy A51 features a better camera than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a way more megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.