Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-07-02 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2248 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than the LG G8S ThinQ's 82.5 general score. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version and LG G8S ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G construction is newer, but just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker than LG G8S ThinQ.
The LG G8S ThinQ features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a just a little worse pixels density, a little bit worse 1080 x 2248 resolution and a little smaller display. The LG G8S ThinQ features a bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG G8S ThinQ also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG G8S ThinQ counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A51 5G. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. Galaxy A51 5G counts with longer battery life than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3550mAh. The Galaxy A51 5G has a better camera than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.