Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-07-02 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2248 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is a bit better than the LG G8S ThinQ's 82.5 general score. Galaxy A52's design is newer than the LG G8S ThinQ's, but it's a bit heavier and just a little thicker. LG G8S ThinQ has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 6 GB RAM memory.
LG G8S ThinQ features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A52, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a quite worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2248 pixels resolution. Galaxy A52 shoots greater photos and videos than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
LG G8S ThinQ features a quite bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A52, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG G8S ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A52 features superior battery duration than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a 27% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.