Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-07-02 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2248 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the LG G8S ThinQ, having a general score of 91.3 against 82.5. Although the Galaxy A52 5G is newer than the LG G8S ThinQ, it's just a little thicker and a little bit heavier. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52 5G has older 12 version and LG G8S ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The LG G8S ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2248px and a just a bit worse pixels number in each screen inch. LG G8S ThinQ has a little bit better performance than Galaxy A52 5G. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy A52 5G features a way better camera than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels. The LG G8S ThinQ features more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG G8S ThinQ also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A52 5G has longer battery performance than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.