Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-07-02 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2248 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is slightly better than LG G8S ThinQ, with a global score of 88.1 against 82.5. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy F62 has older 11 version and LG G8S ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy F62 body is newer than the LG G8S ThinQ's, although it is somewhat thicker and heavier.
LG G8S ThinQ has a little better processing power than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM, the LG G8S ThinQ also has a larger number of cores (and also faster). The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with just a bit better display than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has a quite lower display density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bit bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much better camera than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution.
The LG G8S ThinQ has a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy F62, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG G8S ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy F62 has a really longer battery lifetime than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.