Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-07-02 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2248 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is a little bit better than LG G8S ThinQ, having a general score of 89 against 82.5. The Galaxy Note10 is a a little bit lighter cellphone than the LG G8S ThinQ, but both of them are equally thin. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 and LG G8S ThinQ count with really similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a higher amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
LG G8S ThinQ features a slightly better display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2248px and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better display density. The Galaxy Note10 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than LG G8S ThinQ, and although they both have a 12 MP camera, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy Note10 also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and video.
The LG G8S ThinQ has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note10, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG G8S ThinQ counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has 3550mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.