Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-07-02 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2248 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is just a bit better than the LG G8S ThinQ, getting a global score of 88.3 against 82.5. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S10 has the older 11 version and LG G8S ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy S10 design has the same thickness than the LG G8S ThinQ, but it is somewhat lighter.
The Galaxy S10 has a little more vivid display than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a better pixels count in each inch of display. Samsung Galaxy S10 features a processing unit that is just as good as the processor in LG G8S ThinQ, and although the Samsung Galaxy S10 has more RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy S10 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than LG G8S ThinQ, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same resolution back facing camera and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy S10 also has a bigger aperture. LG G8S ThinQ counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S10, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG G8S ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG G8S ThinQ counts with a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 4% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.