Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-07-02 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2248 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is much better than LG G8S ThinQ, getting a 93.6 score against 82.5. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has the previous 11 version and LG G8S ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's design has the same thickness than LG G8S ThinQ, but it's a little bit heavier.
Galaxy S10 5G's CPU is just as good as the LG G8S ThinQ one, and although the Galaxy S10 5G has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a slightly better looking display than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a just a little higher count of pixels per inch of display, a quite larger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features just a bit better camera than LG G8S ThinQ, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture. LG G8S ThinQ features much more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features longer battery lifetime than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.