Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-07-02 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2248 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is slightly better than the LG G8S ThinQ, having a general score of 86.3 against 82.5. Samsung Galaxy S10e's body has the same thickness than the LG G8S ThinQ, but it is lighter. The Galaxy S10e has a CPU that is just as good as the processor in LG G8S ThinQ, they have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a little bit better looking screen than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2280 resolution and a little greater screen pixel density. LG G8S ThinQ counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the LG G8S ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S10e takes a bit better photos and videos than LG G8S ThinQ, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video quality and a camera with a 12 mega-pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a larger camera aperture. The LG G8S ThinQ features a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 3550mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.