Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-07-02 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2248 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is much better than the LG G8S ThinQ, getting a overall score of 94.8 against 82.5. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has an older 13 version and LG G8S ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy S20's body has the same thickness than LG G8S ThinQ, but it's a bit lighter.
The Galaxy S20 features a little sharper screen than LG G8S ThinQ, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher screen pixels density and a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution. The LG G8S ThinQ features a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S20, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG G8S ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S20 has a bit faster processing unit than LG G8S ThinQ, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 also has 6 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 has a slightly better camera than LG G8S ThinQ, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and a 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a way better video quality.
Galaxy S20 features a bit better battery duration than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a 13% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.