Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-07-02 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2248 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than LG G8S ThinQ's 82.5 global score. The Galaxy S20 FE body is newer than LG G8S ThinQ's, although it is a little thicker and a little heavier. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 FE has older 11 version while LG G8S ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy S20 FE has a processor that's very similar to the LG G8S ThinQ one, both have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores. Galaxy S20 FE and LG G8S ThinQ both have incredibly similar screens, although the Galaxy S20 FE also has a quite larger screen, a bit better amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Galaxy S20 FE captures a bit better photographs and videos than LG G8S ThinQ. Both have a same resolution back camera, the same video frame rate, the same aperture and the same video resolution. The LG G8S ThinQ features a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG G8S ThinQ also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has superior battery lifetime than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a 27% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.