Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-07-02 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2248 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than LG G8S ThinQ, having a score of 95.4 against 82.5. Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction is a lot newer than the LG G8S ThinQ's, but it is way heavier and thicker. Both devices in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and LG G8S ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better looking screen than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a bit larger screen, a just a little higher count of pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px. LG G8S ThinQ counts with a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G8S ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G8S ThinQ counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a superior battery lifetime than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots a lot better videos and photos than LG G8S ThinQ, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot better video resolution and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.