Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-07-02 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2248 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8S ThinQ is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with an 82.5 score against 80.1. LG G8S ThinQ's design is notably thinner and notably lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though it was released about 9 months before. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but LG G8S ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The LG G8S ThinQ counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG G8S ThinQ also has more RAM. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little bit better looking display than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The LG G8S ThinQ features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking photos and videos in low light environments, and they both have a 12 megapixels back camera, the LG G8S ThinQ also counts with a lot higher (4K) video resolution.
The LG G8S ThinQ features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with greater battery duration than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3550mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.