Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-07-02 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2248 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8S ThinQ is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, having an 82.5 score against 81. LG G8S ThinQ is a much thinner and lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, even though both of them were released with only 7 months difference. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but LG G8S ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version, giving you a couple additional features and some performance improvements.
LG G8S ThinQ features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G8S ThinQ also has more RAM. LG G8S ThinQ has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2248px, a quite worse screen density and a little bit smaller display.
The LG G8S ThinQ captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less mega-pixels resolution and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video resolution. The LG G8S ThinQ has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a little longer battery lifetime than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.