Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-07-02 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2248 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than LG G8S ThinQ, having a 94.6 score against 82.5. Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is newer and thinner than LG G8S ThinQ's, although it is also way heavier. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version and LG G8S ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie. LG G8S ThinQ has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a lot lower 1080 x 2248 resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher screen pixel density.
LG G8S ThinQ has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit better hardware performance than LG G8S ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features improved battery life than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a slightly better camera than LG G8S ThinQ. Both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 60 fps video frame rates, a 12 mega-pixels back facing camera and a F1.8 aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.