Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a score of 82.7, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel's score of 80.2. The LG G8X ThinQ design is noticeably newer and a bit thinner, but notably heavier than Google Pixel. Google Pixel features a screen that's just as good as LG G8X ThinQ's screen, because although the Google Pixel has a little lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater quantity of pixels in each display inch.
The LG G8X ThinQ features just a bit better performance than Google Pixel, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores. LG G8X ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has a tinier camera sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality, a back camera with a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution and a worse (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light captures.
LG G8X ThinQ has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG G8X ThinQ has a much longer battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2770mAh.
The LG G8X ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.