Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has a score of 82.7, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 2 XL's global score of 82.5. The LG G8X ThinQ body is incredibly newer than Google Pixel 2 XL's, but it is just a bit heavier and a little bit thicker. LG G8X ThinQ has a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 2 XL features a bit sharper display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a better pixel density. LG G8X ThinQ has a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G8X ThinQ captures clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lesser megapixels camera in the back, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
LG G8X ThinQ features a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 14 percent more battery capacity.
Although LG G8X ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 2 XL. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 2 XL, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.